George Smith
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1941:22 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 84
- Minutes per game
- 23:07
- Points per game
- 5.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.2 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.5 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.5 | 5.5 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 460 | 268 | 111 | 59 | 7 | 64 | 150 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 150–354 | 42.4% | 4.2 | 7.3 |
| 2P | 83–146 | 56.8% | 1.7 | 3.0 |
| 3P | 67–208 | 32.2% | 2.5 | 4.3 |
| FT | 93–134 | 69.4% | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.8% | 55.7% | 58.8% | 37.9% | 1.73 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 George Smith | Penn | 18 | 23:10 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 10.6 | 18.2%† | 81.4% | 55.5%† |
| 2023 George Smith | Penn | 20 | 19:52 | 5.7 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 11.5 | 50.0%† | 54.2%† | 65.1%† |
| 2024 George Smith | Penn | 22 | 25:46 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 24.6% | 70.3% | 47.0%† |
| 2025 George Smith | Penn | 24 | 23:21 | 5.7 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 9.7 | 33.8% | 63.3% | 56.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Penn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -2.2 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -1.7 | +1.8range +1.3 to +2.3 | 1,959 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Penn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.2 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -0.1 | +2.1range +1.7 to +2.6 | 1,914 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Penn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.8 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | -0.7 | +1.6range +1.2 to +2.0 | 1,367 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Penn | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.5 | -1.6 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -1.1 | Not computed for this season | 1,502 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology