Jaden Cooper
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1433:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 86
- Minutes per game
- 16:40
- Points per game
- 5.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.3 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.3 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.7 | 5.6 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 3.3 |
| Season totals | 455 | 199 | 96 | 54 | 6 | 81 | 119 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 163–396 | 41.2% | 4.6 | 11.1 |
| 2P | 91–190 | 47.9% | 2.2 | 5.3 |
| 3P | 72–206 | 35.0% | 2.4 | 5.7 |
| FT | 57–72 | 79.2% | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.3% | 53.2% | 52.0% | 18.2% | 1.19 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Jaden Cooper | Columbia | 20 | 13:03 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 12.9 | 53.6%† | 60.0%† | 57.9%† |
| 2023 Jaden Cooper | Columbia | 15Under 100 minutes | 5:49 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 11.9 | 7.1%† | 84.6%† | 43.7%† |
| 2024 Jaden Cooper | Columbia | 18 | 14:53 | 5.5 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 14.8 | 42.6%† | 100.0%† | 60.1%† |
| 2025 Jaden Cooper | Columbia | 3Few games | 11:58 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 14.5 | 16.7%† | — | 50.0%† |
| 2026 Jaden Cooper | UMES | 30 | 26:03 | 7.8 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 11.9 | 31.5% | 82.9% | 50.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
MD E Shore · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $34K
- 80% range $10K to $110K
- Median share of team pool
- 19.7%
- team pool $155K, 80% range $56K to $415K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $32K to $38K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 64.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
MD E Shore: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MD E Shore | $34Kspeculative | $10K to $110K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.7 | -0.2 to +1.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | +2.0 | +3.3range +2.9 to +3.7 | 2,528 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2024 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | -0.4 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -0.6 | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.6 | 928 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.3 | -1.9 to -0.6 | Limited evidence | -0.7 | -0.7 | +0.2range +0.2 to +0.3 | 301 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2022 | Columbia | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -2.0 | -3.1 to -1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -2.2 | Not computed for this season | 882 | ||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology