Enoch Boakye
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1655:41 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 98
- Minutes per game
- 16:54
- Points per game
- 3.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.1 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.8 | 5.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.0 | 12.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 |
| Season totals | 373 | 496 | 28 | 25 | 82 | 84 | 188 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 150–250 | 60.0% | 2.6 | 6.0 |
| 2P | 150–250 | 60.0% | 2.6 | 6.0 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 73–133 | 54.9% | 1.4 | 3.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.0% | 60.4% | 0.0% | 53.2% | 0.33 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Enoch Boakye | Arizona St | 28 | 11:45 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 5.4 | — | 22.2%† | 42.4%† |
| 2023 Enoch Boakye | Arizona St | 16Under 100 minutes | 3:01 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 9.1 | — | 33.3%† | 46.0%† |
| 2024 Enoch Boakye | Fresno St | 24 | 23:23 | 7.8 | 8.0 | 0.4 | 13.3 | — | 52.7% | 61.8% |
| 2025 Enoch Boakye | Villanova | 30 | 23:55 | 4.4 | 6.4 | 0.3 | 7.3 | — | 72.5% | 70.1%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Villanova | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.8 | +1.5 to +4.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +2.6 | +3.7range +3.1 to +4.4 | 1,986 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Fresno St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.3 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +0.4 | +1.6range +1.3 to +2.0 | 1,724 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2022 | Arizona St | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.0 | -0.1 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.7 | +2.7 | Not computed for this season | 1,122 | ||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology