Isaiah Caldwell
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1282:12 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 94
- Minutes per game
- 13:38
- Points per game
- 2.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.8 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 5.9 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 188 | 167 | 58 | 53 | 10 | 36 | 84 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 70–192 | 36.5% | 2.0 | 6.0 |
| 2P | 56–124 | 45.2% | 1.3 | 3.9 |
| 3P | 14–68 | 20.6% | 0.7 | 2.1 |
| FT | 34–47 | 72.3% | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.1% | 44.2% | 35.4% | 24.5% | 1.61 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Isaiah Caldwell | Army | 22 | 11:24 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 11.1%† | 81.8%† | 41.5%† |
| 2023 Isaiah Caldwell | Army | 27 | 10:43 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 30.0%† | 71.4%† | 51.2%† |
| 2024 Isaiah Caldwell | Army | 20 | 11:37 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 6.4 | 33.3%† | 91.7%† | 55.6%† |
| 2025 Isaiah Caldwell | Army | 25 | 20:23 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 5.3 | 20.6%† | 52.9%† | 38.4%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Army | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.9 | -4.5 to -1.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | -1.6 | +1.2range +0.8 to +1.8 | 1,680 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Army | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.7 | -2.6 to -1.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.1 | -0.6 | +0.6range +0.4 to +0.7 | 720 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Army | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.6 | -3.5 to -1.7 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | -1.6 | +0.7range +0.5 to +0.9 | 964 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Army | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.6 | -1.6 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | +0.3 | Not computed for this season | 873 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology