Milos Ilic
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2175:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 94
- Minutes per game
- 23:09
- Points per game
- 7.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.3 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.9 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.7 | 9.1 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 4.6 |
| Season totals | 743 | 494 | 164 | 65 | 24 | 164 | 250 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 285–548 | 52.0% | 5.8 | 10.1 |
| 2P | 249–432 | 57.6% | 4.6 | 7.9 |
| 3P | 36–116 | 31.0% | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| FT | 137–195 | 70.3% | 2.1 | 3.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.3% | 58.6% | 21.2% | 35.6% | 1.00 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Milos Ilic | Loyola MD | 14 | 24:01 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 10.0 | 28.2%† | 83.3%† | 48.9%† |
| 2024 Milos Ilic | Loyola MD | 26 | 25:53 | 8.0 | 4.9 | 1.3 | 12.3 | 25.0%† | 65.6% | 54.5% |
| 2025 Milos Ilic | Loyola MD | 21 | 28:16 | 15.6 | 7.9 | 3.3 | 22.1 | 41.2%† | 70.3% | 63.7% |
| 2026 Milos Ilic | California | 33 | 17:21 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 8.7 | 28.6%† | 71.4% | 61.7%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
California · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $270K
- 80% range $97K to $450K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.8%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $270K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 42.4%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
California: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | California | $270Kspeculative | $97K to $450K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.6 | +0.2 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | +1.0 | +3.3range +2.7 to +3.7 | 1,897 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Loyola MD | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.9 | +0.9 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +0.9 | +4.4range +3.8 to +5.1 | 2,032 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Loyola MD | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -1.1 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | -1.7 | +2.0 | +2.1range +1.6 to +2.6 | 2,285 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Loyola MD | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.9 | -2.9 to -1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | -1.0 | Not computed for this season | 1,105 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology