Grant Asman
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1806:54 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 110
- Minutes per game
- 16:26
- Points per game
- 6.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.1 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.1 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.0 | 7.5 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 676 | 339 | 122 | 60 | 60 | 123 | 162 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 245–527 | 46.5% | 4.8 | 11.7 |
| 2P | 163–257 | 63.4% | 2.3 | 5.7 |
| 3P | 82–270 | 30.4% | 2.5 | 6.0 |
| FT | 104–147 | 70.7% | 1.3 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.3% | 57.1% | 51.2% | 27.9% | 0.99 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Grant Asman | Lipscomb | 6Few games | 12:22 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 14.6 | 16.7%† | 66.7%† | 44.1%† |
| 2023 Grant Asman | Lipscomb | 26 | 6:47 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 12.0 | 22.6%† | 88.9%† | 48.2%† |
| 2024 Grant Asman | Lipscomb | 25 | 15:52 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 11.0 | 31.6%† | 58.6% | 54.1%† |
| 2025 Grant Asman | Lipscomb | 23 | 13:58 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 8.7 | 20.0%† | 58.3%† | 48.9%† |
| 2026 Grant Asman | Lipscomb | 30 | 27:57 | 13.9 | 5.8 | 1.7 | 19.9 | 35.3% | 77.2% | 62.5% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Lipscomb · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $38K
- 80% range $12K to $115K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.6%
- team pool $245K, 80% range $90K to $655K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $37K to $39K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 71.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Lipscomb: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Lipscomb | $38Kspeculative | $12K to $115K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +0.7 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | +0.6 | +5.1range +4.5 to +5.9 | 2,520 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Lipscomb | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.2 | -0.0 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +1.3 | +1.4range +1.2 to +1.7 | 1,058 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Lipscomb | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.6 | +0.5 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | +0.8 | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.3 | 1,347 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Lipscomb | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.6 | -0.3 to +1.3 | Limited evidence | +0.0 | +0.6 | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.8 | 573 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology