Kezza Giffa
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2070:45 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 93
- Minutes per game
- 22:16
- Points per game
- 11.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.8 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 1026 | 189 | 178 | 41 | 5 | 146 | 167 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 280–658 | 42.6% | 7.1 | 12.7 |
| 2P | 194–399 | 48.6% | 4.3 | 7.7 |
| 3P | 86–259 | 33.2% | 2.8 | 5.0 |
| FT | 380–442 | 86.0% | 4.8 | 8.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.1% | 60.2% | 39.4% | 67.2% | 1.22 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Kezza Giffa | UTEP | 11Under 100 minutes | 1:49 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 33.3%† | 100.0%† | 42.5%† |
| 2024 Kezza Giffa | High Point | 26 | 30:39 | 16.4 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 21.4 | 34.0% | 87.5% | 59.8% |
| 2025 Kezza Giffa | High Point | 29 | 28:51 | 15.1 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 20.9 | 31.9% | 85.4% | 59.5% |
| 2026 Kezza Giffa | Ole Miss | 27 | 15:27 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 15.0 | 35.0%† | 83.1% | 64.1%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Mississippi · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $270K
- 80% range $160K to $435K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.3%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $270K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 29.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Mississippi: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mississippi | $270Kspeculative | $160K to $435K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.6 | +1.3 to +3.7 | Sufficient evidence | +2.2 | +0.5 | +2.3range +2.0 to +2.5 | 1,287 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | High Point | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.0 | +2.0 to +4.2 | Sufficient evidence | +3.1 | -0.0 | +4.4range +3.8 to +5.3 | 2,857 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | High Point | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -1.0 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | -2.0 | +3.2range +2.5 to +4.0 | 2,243 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology