Connor Hickman
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
3165:08 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 112
- Minutes per game
- 28:16
- Points per game
- 9.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.8 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.9 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.5 |
| Season totals | 1097 | 331 | 203 | 87 | 11 | 164 | 199 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 402–961 | 41.8% | 8.6 | 12.1 |
| 2P | 230–465 | 49.5% | 4.2 | 5.9 |
| 3P | 172–496 | 34.7% | 4.4 | 6.3 |
| FT | 121–167 | 72.5% | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.8% | 53.0% | 51.6% | 17.4% | 1.24 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Connor Hickman | Bradley | 26 | 23:01 | 7.4 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 12.8 | 42.1% | 81.5% | 56.8% |
| 2023 Connor Hickman | Bradley | 23 | 30:03 | 8.3 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 11.0 | 33.0% | 60.0%† | 47.8% |
| 2024 Connor Hickman | Bradley | 27 | 33:01 | 15.3 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 18.5 | 40.6% | 68.3% | 59.2% |
| 2025 Connor Hickman | Cincinnati | 11 | 19:03 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 6.3 | 15.4%† | 50.0%† | 33.1%† |
| 2026 Connor Hickman | Col. of Charleston | 25 | 30:59 | 10.8 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 13.9 | 28.3% | 78.2% | 50.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Col Charleston · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $21K
- 80% range $3K to $71K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.8%
- team pool $275K, 80% range $99K to $735K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $19K to $28K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 62.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Col Charleston: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Col Charleston | $21Kspeculative | $3K to $71K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -0.9 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -0.1 | +4.4range +3.7 to +5.0 | 2,675 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Cincinnati | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.0 | +0.1 to +1.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | +1.7 | +1.0range +0.9 to +1.1 | 714 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Bradley | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.9 | +1.7 to +4.1 | Sufficient evidence | +2.2 | +0.8 | +4.8range +3.9 to +5.7 | 2,809 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Bradley | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.3 to +2.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | +1.1 | +3.8range +3.1 to +4.5 | 2,195 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Bradley | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.0 | +1.0 to +3.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | +1.3 | Not computed for this season | 2,023 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology