Tyem Freeman
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1317:34 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 86
- Minutes per game
- 15:19
- Points per game
- 5.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.3 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.4 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.0 | 6.0 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 461 | 198 | 84 | 31 | 14 | 67 | 100 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 164–364 | 45.1% | 4.2 | 11.1 |
| 2P | 108–208 | 51.9% | 2.4 | 6.3 |
| 3P | 56–156 | 35.9% | 1.8 | 4.7 |
| FT | 77–108 | 71.3% | 1.3 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.7% | 56.0% | 42.9% | 29.7% | 1.25 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Tyem Freeman | UCF | 25 | 12:00 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 14.5 | 25.0%† | 81.5% | 62.0%† |
| 2023 Tyem Freeman | UCF | 21 | 11:46 | 3.8 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 12.8 | 27.8%† | 57.1% | 47.4%† |
| 2024 Tyem Freeman | Kent | 26 | 14:35 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 16.5 | 49.0% | 76.7% | 60.8% |
| 2025 Tyem Freeman | IL Chicago | 14 | 27:56 | 8.4 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 12.0 | 31.3% | 69.6%† | 52.2% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | IL Chicago | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.9 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +0.0 | +3.4range +2.8 to +3.9 | 1,368 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Kent | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -1.0 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.5 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.7 | 1,199 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | UCF | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.2 | +0.0 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.9 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.3 | 805 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | UCF | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.1 | -1.1 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.4 | Not computed for this season | 989 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology