Jarin Stevenson
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2047:29 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 101
- Minutes per game
- 20:16
- Points per game
- 6.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.5 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.2 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.2 | 7.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 627 | 357 | 70 | 42 | 52 | 89 | 203 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 207–474 | 43.7% | 4.7 | 9.3 |
| 2P | 127–202 | 62.9% | 2.0 | 3.9 |
| 3P | 80–272 | 29.4% | 2.7 | 5.3 |
| FT | 133–193 | 68.9% | 1.9 | 3.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.1% | 56.1% | 57.4% | 40.7% | 0.79 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Jarin Stevenson | Alabama | 33 | 16:43 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 12.5 | 29.9% | 68.9% | 53.8% |
| 2025 Jarin Stevenson | Alabama | 35 | 18:31 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 11.6 | 28.9% | 61.0% | 54.0% |
| 2026 Jarin Stevenson | North Carolina | 33 | 25:42 | 8.1 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 12.5 | 29.5% | 74.2% | 59.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Carolina · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $390K
- 80% range $170K to $605K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.3%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $390K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 63.7%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Carolina: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Carolina | $390Kspeculative | $170K to $605K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.0 | +1.5 to +4.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.7 | +1.3 | +5.3range +4.5 to +6.0 | 2,717 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Alabama | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.6 | +1.1 to +4.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +1.7 | +3.5range +2.9 to +4.1 | 2,532 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Alabama | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | -0.6 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +0.2 | +2.2range +1.6 to +2.7 | 2,097 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology