Jamiya Neal
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2927:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 117
- Minutes per game
- 25:01
- Points per game
- 7.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.2 / 2.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.7 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.4 | 6.7 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Season totals | 904 | 489 | 250 | 104 | 36 | 158 | 184 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 340–828 | 41.1% | 7.1 | 11.3 |
| 2P | 232–463 | 50.1% | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| 3P | 108–365 | 29.6% | 3.1 | 5.0 |
| FT | 116–188 | 61.7% | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.6% | 49.6% | 44.1% | 22.7% | 1.58 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Jamiya Neal | Arizona St | 27 | 14:24 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 5.7 | 20.5%† | 68.8%† | 33.9%† |
| 2023 Jamiya Neal | Arizona St | 28 | 15:47 | 4.7 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 12.0 | 30.4% | 63.3% | 51.9% |
| 2024 Jamiya Neal | Arizona St | 29 | 33:12 | 11.1 | 5.5 | 1.9 | 13.4 | 28.6% | 66.7% | 50.0% |
| 2025 Jamiya Neal | Creighton | 33 | 34:22 | 12.0 | 6.0 | 4.2 | 13.9 | 32.6% | 55.3% | 51.9% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Creighton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.7 | +1.5 to +3.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +1.8 | +6.3range +5.4 to +7.3 | 3,754 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Arizona St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.2 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | +1.5 | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.5 | 3,465 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Arizona St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.9 | +0.7 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +1.6 | +2.2range +1.9 to +2.7 | 1,537 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Arizona St | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.2 | -1.4 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -1.5 | +1.3 | Not computed for this season | 1,326 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology