Kyle Cuffe Jr.
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1051:38 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 82
- Minutes per game
- 12:49
- Points per game
- 4.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.2 / 0.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.8 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 5.2 |
| Season totals | 389 | 98 | 32 | 37 | 8 | 55 | 137 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 127–364 | 34.9% | 4.4 | 13.8 |
| 2P | 70–172 | 40.7% | 2.1 | 6.5 |
| 3P | 57–192 | 29.7% | 2.3 | 7.3 |
| FT | 78–107 | 72.9% | 1.3 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.7% | 47.3% | 52.7% | 29.4% | 0.58 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Kyle Cuffe Jr. | Kansas | 2Few games | 2:37 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0.0%† | 0.0%† |
| 2024 Kyle Cuffe Jr. | Syracuse | 24 | 9:57 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 9.7 | 25.0%† | 46.2%† | 42.8%† |
| 2025 Kyle Cuffe Jr. | Syracuse | 28 | 12:30 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 16.1 | 27.9% | 78.0% | 46.4% |
| 2026 Kyle Cuffe Jr. | Mercer | 28 | 16:21 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 16.6 | 32.3% | 78.8% | 50.4% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Mercer · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $4K
- 80% range $1K to $19K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.1%
- team pool $255K, 80% range $96K to $690K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $3K to $4K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 39.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Mercer: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mercer | $4Kspeculative | $1K to $19K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -3.2 | -4.6 to -1.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -3.0 | +1.6range +1.2 to +1.9 | 1,469 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.8 | -2.9 to -0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -1.9 | +1.0range +0.8 to +1.2 | 1,126 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.3 | -2.2 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | -0.3 | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.9 | 853 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology