Cameron Corhen
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1942:14 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 62
- Minutes per game
- 31:20
- Points per game
- 12.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.0 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.3 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.8 | 7.6 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 765 | 369 | 90 | 50 | 38 | 109 | 185 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 306–537 | 57.0% | 8.7 | 11.1 |
| 2P | 291–495 | 58.8% | 8.0 | 10.2 |
| 3P | 15–42 | 35.7%† | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| FT | 138–208 | 66.3% | 3.4 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.4% | 60.9% | 7.8% | 38.7% | 0.83 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Cameron Corhen | Pittsburgh | 29 | 28:28 | 10.9 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 15.4 | 25.0%† | 61.5% | 63.8% |
| 2026 Cameron Corhen | Pittsburgh | 33 | 33:51 | 13.6 | 6.8 | 1.9 | 16.0 | 36.8%† | 69.2% | 58.9% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Pittsburgh · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $475K
- 80% range $78K to $780K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.3%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $475K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $35K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 84.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Pittsburgh: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Pittsburgh | $475Kspeculative | $78K to $780K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -1.0 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +0.1 | +5.1range +4.4 to +5.7 | 3,505 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Pittsburgh | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.3 | -1.8 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.1 | +3.1range +2.4 to +3.9 | 2,717 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology