Franck Kepnang
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1751:38 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 101
- Minutes per game
- 17:21
- Points per game
- 5.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 0.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.5 | 4.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.6 | 10.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 5.5 |
| Season totals | 552 | 436 | 14 | 40 | 161 | 83 | 243 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 227–419 | 54.2% | 4.1 | 9.6 |
| 2P | 227–417 | 54.4% | 4.1 | 9.5 |
| 3P | 0–2 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 98–144 | 68.1% | 1.4 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.2% | 57.2% | 0.5% | 34.4% | 0.17 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Franck Kepnang | Oregon | 15 | 7:51 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 11.2 | — | 58.3%† | 65.3%† |
| 2022 Franck Kepnang | Oregon | 32 | 14:57 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 0.1 | 12.5 | — | 65.0% | 60.2% |
| 2023 Franck Kepnang | Washington | 7Few games | 23:14 | 8.9 | 6.4 | 0.3 | 15.3 | — | 70.0%† | 57.6%† |
| 2024 Franck Kepnang | Washington | 7Few games | 16:50 | 8.4 | 5.4 | 0.3 | 20.0 | 0.0%† | 53.8%† | 57.0%† |
| 2025 Franck Kepnang | Washington | 14 | 19:52 | 6.9 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 13.8 | — | 80.0%† | 57.3%† |
| 2026 Franck Kepnang | Washington | 26 | 22:57 | 5.8 | 6.3 | 0.2 | 10.2 | 0.0%† | 71.8% | 53.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Washington · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $445K
- 80% range $285K to $760K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.1%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $445K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 46.4%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Washington: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Washington | $445Kspeculative | $285K to $760K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.4 | +2.3 to +4.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | +4.0 | +3.9range +3.5 to +4.3 | 2,037 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Washington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.2 | +0.2 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +1.6 | +1.0range +0.8 to +1.1 | 955 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Washington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.8 | +1.8 to +3.6 | Limited evidence | +0.7 | +2.1 | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.7 | 438 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | Washington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -0.2 to +1.0 | Limited evidence | -0.2 | +0.5 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.7 | 562 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2022 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -2.3 | -3.7 to -1.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | -1.0 | Not computed for this season | 1,527 | ||
| 2021 | Oregon | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.9 | -0.0 to +1.7 | Limited evidence | -0.1 | +1.0 | Not computed for this season | 391 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology