Ben Gregg
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1533:03 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 108
- Minutes per game
- 14:12
- Points per game
- 5.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.9 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.5 | 10.1 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 4.4 |
| Season totals | 632 | 388 | 88 | 62 | 49 | 58 | 168 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 221–428 | 51.6% | 4.0 | 11.2 |
| 2P | 151–230 | 65.7% | 2.1 | 6.0 |
| 3P | 70–198 | 35.4% | 1.8 | 5.2 |
| FT | 120–164 | 73.2% | 1.5 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.8% | 63.2% | 46.3% | 38.3% | 1.52 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Ben Gregg | Gonzaga | 17Under 100 minutes | 2:50 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 13.3 | 25.0%† | 0.0%† | 45.9%† |
| 2022 Ben Gregg | Gonzaga | 14Under 100 minutes | 5:11 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 13.2 | 37.5%† | 20.0%† | 37.3%† |
| 2023 Ben Gregg | Gonzaga | 25 | 11:39 | 4.7 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 16.2 | 40.4%† | 79.3% | 63.6%† |
| 2024 Ben Gregg | Gonzaga | 24 | 23:37 | 9.0 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 15.3 | 40.3% | 71.2% | 67.8% |
| 2025 Ben Gregg | Gonzaga | 28 | 19:48 | 9.2 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 18.5 | 27.0% | 77.1% | 65.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Gonzaga | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.9 | +3.0 to +5.0 | Sufficient evidence | +3.1 | +0.8 | +2.8range +2.5 to +3.2 | 2,014 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Gonzaga | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.6 | +1.4 to +3.8 | Sufficient evidence | +3.1 | -0.5 | +2.7range +2.3 to +3.3 | 1,975 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Gonzaga | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.9 | +0.8 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +0.5 | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.8 | 1,033 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology