Aziz Bandaogo

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

2611:45 minutes logged

Games logged: 116
Minutes per game: 22:31
Points per game: 6.7
Rebounds / assists per game: 6.5 / 0.6

Box line on three bases
Basis	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF
Per game	6.7	6.5	0.6	0.5	1.7	1.1	2.0
Per 40 minutes	11.9	11.6	1.1	0.9	3.0	1.9	3.5
Season totals	780	757	74	56	193	124	229

Shooting with attempts
Shot	Made–att.	Pct	Att/G	Att/40
FG	290–487	59.5%	4.2	7.5
2P	286–474	60.3%	4.1	7.3
3P	4–13	30.8%†	0.1	0.2
FT	196–322	60.9%	2.8	4.9

Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%	Estimated TS%	3PA / FGA	FTA / FGA	AST / TO
60.0%	62.0%	2.7%	66.1%	0.60

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
Season	Team	G	MPG	Pts	Reb	Ast	Pts/40	3P%	FT%	TS%
2021 Aziz Bandaogo	Akron	6Few games	2:10	1.2	0.8	0.0	21.5	—	62.5%†	53.7%†
2022 Aziz Bandaogo	Akron	23	11:28	2.7	3.1	0.3	9.2	—	48.1%	49.3%†
2023 Aziz Bandaogo	Utah Valley	27	31:01	11.2	10.3	1.0	14.4	27.3%†	65.9%	60.6%
2024 Aziz Bandaogo	Cincinnati	28	23:52	6.6	7.5	0.6	11.1	50.0%†	55.3%	64.1%
2025 Aziz Bandaogo	Cincinnati	32	25:54	7.0	6.0	0.7	10.9	—	64.3%	67.4%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Season	Team	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range	Split role	Net	Range	Evidence	Offense	Defense	Wins above replacement	On-court possessions	Sample and flags
2025	Cincinnati	None: no budget that season	—	evaluation: examined, post hoc	+2.6	+1.6 to +3.7	Sufficient evidence	+0.4	+2.3	+4.4range +3.8 to +5.0	2,641	Season detail
2024	Cincinnati	None: no budget that season	—	evaluation: examined, post hoc	+4.2	+3.0 to +5.5	Sufficient evidence	+0.6	+3.6	+3.3range +2.8 to +3.8	2,159	Season detail
2023	Utah Valley	None: no budget that season	—	evaluation: examined, post hoc	+2.6	+1.6 to +3.4	Sufficient evidence	+0.1	+2.5	+4.6range +3.9 to +5.3	2,429	Season detail
2022	Akron	None: no budget that season	—	development: in model selection	+0.7	-0.8 to +2.1	Sufficient evidence	-1.0	+1.7	Not computed for this season	844
2021	Not applicable	None: no budget that season	—	development: in model selection	No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.						Not applicable

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology