Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Rankings / Athletes / Mark Sears

Mark Sears

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

4465:45 minutes logged

Games logged
144
Minutes per game
31:01
Points per game
16.9
Rebounds / assists per game
3.9 / 3.9
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game16.93.93.91.30.12.31.7
Per 40 minutes21.85.15.01.60.13.02.2
Season totals243256455718212332246
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG743–167544.4%11.615.0
2P468–92150.8%6.48.2
3P275–75436.5%5.26.8
FT671–77486.7%5.46.9
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
52.6%60.3%45.0%46.2%1.68

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2021Ohio 1819:369.03.23.418.427.8%†87.3%59.0%
2022Ohio 2535:2620.26.13.922.841.4%92.3%60.2%
2023Alabama 3330:1412.83.52.617.034.3%85.1%58.8%
2024Alabama 3333:1421.14.14.225.441.4%86.0%65.5%
2025Alabama 3532:2218.52.95.022.833.3%84.6%57.0%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleNetRangeEvidencePosition on one axisOffenseDefenseWins above replacementOn-court possessionsSample and flags
2025AlabamaNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc+4.1+2.7 to +5.0Sufficient evidence+3.7+0.4+7.1range +6.3 to +8.04,407Season detail
2024AlabamaNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc+4.4+3.1 to +5.6Sufficient evidence+4.2+0.2+6.8range +5.9 to +7.94,207Season detail
2023AlabamaNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc+3.4+2.2 to +4.7Sufficient evidence+2.1+1.3+5.0range +4.1 to +5.93,741Season detail
2022OhioNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection+2.7+1.6 to +3.6Sufficient evidence+2.5+0.2Not computed for this season3,086
2021OhioNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection+1.9+0.7 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+2.4-0.5Not computed for this season1,2662020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology