Clark Slajchert
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2047:19 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 87
- Minutes per game
- 23:32
- Points per game
- 10.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.2 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.4 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.7 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 904 | 193 | 139 | 55 | 3 | 125 | 181 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 325–730 | 44.5% | 8.4 | 14.3 |
| 2P | 225–441 | 51.0% | 5.1 | 8.6 |
| 3P | 100–289 | 34.6% | 3.3 | 5.6 |
| FT | 154–184 | 83.7% | 2.1 | 3.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.4% | 55.7% | 39.6% | 25.2% | 1.11 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Clark Slajchert | Penn | 20 | 24:17 | 10.9 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 18.0 | 32.7% | 85.7% | 55.7% |
| 2023 Clark Slajchert | Penn | 24 | 29:11 | 13.2 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 18.0 | 32.0% | 87.5% | 54.2% |
| 2024 Clark Slajchert | Penn | 16 | 35:13 | 16.4 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 18.6 | 40.2% | 82.9% | 58.4% |
| 2025 Clark Slajchert | USC | 27 | 11:02 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 14.4 | 31.3%† | 71.4% | 54.4%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | USC | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.2 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | -1.3 | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.1 | 864 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Penn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.8 | -0.5 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.7 | -0.9 | +2.4range +2.0 to +3.0 | 1,913 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Penn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.7 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.5 | +2.8range +2.2 to +3.4 | 2,467 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Penn | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.9 | -2.7 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | -2.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,724 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology