Jeremiah Williams
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1793:18 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 77
- Minutes per game
- 23:17
- Points per game
- 7.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 2.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.4 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.8 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 573 | 201 | 200 | 83 | 25 | 125 | 160 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 213–495 | 43.0% | 6.4 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 181–389 | 46.5% | 5.1 | 8.7 |
| 3P | 32–106 | 30.2% | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| FT | 115–162 | 71.0% | 2.1 | 3.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.3% | 50.6% | 21.4% | 32.7% | 1.60 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Jeremiah Williams | Temple | 3Few games | 33:32 | 7.7 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 9.1 | 33.3%† | 81.8%† | 58.0%† |
| 2024 Jeremiah Williams | Rutgers | 12 | 26:36 | 12.2 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 18.3 | 20.8%† | 78.4% | 51.3% |
| 2025 Jeremiah Williams | Rutgers | 29 | 24:07 | 7.1 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 11.7 | 28.6%† | 67.2% | 52.6% |
| 2026 Jeremiah Williams | Georgetown | 33 | 20:26 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 11.8 | 38.2%† | 67.9% | 47.5% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgetown · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $220K
- 80% range $35K to $490K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.1%
- team pool $3.65M, 80% range $2.05M to $6.35M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $215K to $220K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 51.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgetown: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgetown | $220Kspeculative | $35K to $490K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.1 | -1.0 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.0 | +3.4range +2.9 to +3.8 | 2,072 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Rutgers | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.1 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | +0.8 | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.9 | 2,487 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Rutgers | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -2.3 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.6 | +0.9range +0.6 to +1.2 | 1,090 | Season detail | |
| 2021 | Temple | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +3.3 | +2.5 to +4.3 | Limited evidence | +1.6 | +1.7 | Not computed for this season | 347 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology