Kellen Amos
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2372:15 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 93
- Minutes per game
- 25:30
- Points per game
- 10.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.2 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.0 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 2.5 |
| Season totals | 948 | 337 | 170 | 72 | 56 | 185 | 151 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 338–790 | 42.8% | 8.5 | 13.3 |
| 2P | 229–435 | 52.6% | 4.7 | 7.3 |
| 3P | 109–355 | 30.7% | 3.8 | 6.0 |
| FT | 163–240 | 67.9% | 2.6 | 4.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.7% | 52.9% | 44.9% | 30.4% | 0.92 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Kellen Amos | Binghamton | 4Few games | 11:09 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 6.3 | 0.0%† | 75.0%† | 22.2%† |
| 2022 Kellen Amos | Binghamton | 18 | 13:17 | 6.1 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 18.4 | 32.7% | 52.4%† | 51.8%† |
| 2023 Kellen Amos | Central Conn | 24 | 31:25 | 14.1 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 18.0 | 35.4% | 60.5% | 55.6% |
| 2024 Kellen Amos | Central Conn | 22 | 32:50 | 11.9 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 14.5 | 27.5% | 79.1% | 49.2% |
| 2025 Kellen Amos | Rice | 25 | 24:29 | 9.2 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 15.0 | 28.9%† | 66.4% | 56.8% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rice | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.0 | -1.4 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.1 | +2.9range +2.3 to +3.4 | 1,999 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Central Conn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.3 | -1.6 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.3 | +2.9range +2.3 to +3.9 | 2,328 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Central Conn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.4 | -3.6 to -1.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -2.0 | +2.2range +1.4 to +2.9 | 2,538 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Binghamton | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.6 | -1.7 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.7 | Not computed for this season | 813 | ||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology