CJ Noland
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2032:56 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 109
- Minutes per game
- 18:39
- Points per game
- 6.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.8 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.5 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 739 | 222 | 121 | 85 | 19 | 114 | 176 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 268–619 | 43.3% | 5.7 | 12.2 |
| 2P | 179–352 | 50.9% | 3.2 | 6.9 |
| 3P | 89–267 | 33.3% | 2.4 | 5.3 |
| FT | 114–161 | 70.8% | 1.5 | 3.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5% | 53.6% | 43.1% | 26.0% | 1.06 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 CJ Noland | Oklahoma | 29 | 12:36 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 13.1 | 41.7%† | 75.0%† | 63.0%† |
| 2023 CJ Noland | Oklahoma | 24 | 15:25 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 9.0 | 24.1% | 52.6%† | 45.9%† |
| 2024 CJ Noland | North Texas | 27 | 26:16 | 11.0 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 16.7 | 37.0% | 70.0% | 53.0% |
| 2025 CJ Noland | New Mexico | 29 | 20:17 | 8.3 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 16.3 | 32.3% | 78.0% | 53.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | New Mexico | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.4 | +0.4 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +0.2 | +2.8range +2.4 to +3.3 | 2,011 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | North Texas | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.4 | +0.0 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +0.6 | +3.1range +2.4 to +3.8 | 2,120 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Oklahoma | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.3 | -1.1 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | +0.4 | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.5 | 1,229 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Oklahoma | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.6 | -2.3 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,103 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology