Kaleb Brown
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1406:49 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 86
- Minutes per game
- 16:22
- Points per game
- 3.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.2 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.5 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 8.5 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 299 | 191 | 145 | 47 | 17 | 118 | 122 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 101–271 | 37.3% | 3.2 | 7.7 |
| 2P | 58–123 | 47.2% | 1.4 | 3.5 |
| 3P | 43–148 | 29.1% | 1.7 | 4.2 |
| FT | 54–84 | 64.3% | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.2% | 48.5% | 54.6% | 31.0% | 1.23 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Kaleb Brown | Missouri | 23 | 10:17 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 30.8%† | 22.2%† | 38.0%† |
| 2023 Kaleb Brown | Missouri | 10Under 100 minutes | 7:33 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 4.8 | 25.0%† | — | 56.3%† |
| 2025 Kaleb Brown | CS Fullerton | 23 | 21:27 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 11.7 | 27.4% | 74.0% | 48.0% |
| 2026 Kaleb Brown | Robert Morris | 30 | 20:03 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 8.2 | 30.4% | 60.0% | 51.2% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Robert Morris · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $8K
- 80% range $1K to $33K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.8%
- team pool $230K, 80% range $83K to $620K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $8K to $9K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 47.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Robert Morris: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Robert Morris | $8Kspeculative | $1K to $33K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.8 | -1.8 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.2 | +3.0range +2.6 to +3.5 | 1,866 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | CS Fullerton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -3.0 | -4.2 to -1.8 | Sufficient evidence | -2.1 | -1.0 | +0.6range +0.4 to +0.9 | 1,712 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2022 | Missouri | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.3 | -0.8 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.2 | Not computed for this season | 731 | ||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology