Luke Turner
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1059:30 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 90
- Minutes per game
- 11:46
- Points per game
- 2.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.6 / 0.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 7.3 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| Season totals | 193 | 145 | 46 | 15 | 3 | 28 | 47 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 67–216 | 31.0% | 2.4 | 8.2 |
| 2P | 20–56 | 35.7%† | 0.6 | 2.1 |
| 3P | 47–160 | 29.4% | 1.8 | 6.0 |
| FT | 12–19 | 63.2%† | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.9% | 43.0% | 74.1% | 8.8% | 1.64 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Luke Turner | Wofford | 23 | 9:18 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 7.7 | 28.0%† | 0.0%† | 45.2%† |
| 2023 Luke Turner | UC Riverside | 26 | 17:51 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 7.2 | 35.9% | 83.3%† | 52.1%† |
| 2024 Luke Turner | UC Riverside | 24 | 11:03 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 6.9 | 23.4%† | 62.5%† | 34.1%† |
| 2025 Luke Turner | UC Riverside | 17 | 6:51 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 7.6 | 25.0%† | 100.0%† | 35.6%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | UC Riverside | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.8 | -2.5 to -1.1 | Limited evidence | -0.9 | -1.0 | +0.3range +0.3 to +0.4 | 377 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | UC Riverside | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.7 | -3.1 to -0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -1.6 | -0.1 | +0.8range +0.5 to +1.0 | 909 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | UC Riverside | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.2 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | +1.5 | +2.6range +2.1 to +3.1 | 1,580 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Wofford | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.4 | +0.4 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | +1.4 | Not computed for this season | 691 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology