Shaqir O'Neal
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1160:51 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 80
- Minutes per game
- 14:31
- Points per game
- 3.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.7 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.2 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 5.4 |
| Season totals | 296 | 191 | 45 | 27 | 26 | 60 | 156 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 95–241 | 39.4% | 3.0 | 8.3 |
| 2P | 66–141 | 46.8% | 1.8 | 4.9 |
| 3P | 29–100 | 29.0% | 1.3 | 3.4 |
| FT | 77–107 | 72.0% | 1.3 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.4% | 51.4% | 41.5% | 44.4% | 0.75 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Shaqir O'Neal | TX Southern | 13Under 100 minutes | 6:22 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 4.3 | 0.0%† | 71.4%† | 23.6%† |
| 2024 Shaqir O'Neal | TX Southern | 19 | 8:43 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 6.5 | 23.5%† | 60.0%† | 44.1%† |
| 2025 Shaqir O'Neal | Florida A&M | 20 | 18:15 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 12.6 | 34.4%† | 64.0% | 55.3%† |
| 2026 Shaqir O'Neal | Sacramento St. | 28 | 19:33 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 10.6 | 31.8%† | 78.3% | 53.9% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
CS Sacramento · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $18K
- 80% range $2K to $74K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.5%
- team pool $300K, 80% range $105K to $785K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $14K to $20K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 49.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
CS Sacramento: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CS Sacramento | $18Kspeculative | $2K to $74K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.9 | -2.1 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | -0.2 | +2.2range +1.9 to +2.5 | 2,013 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Florida A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.8 | -3.8 to -1.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | -1.4 | +1.0range +0.7 to +1.3 | 1,296 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | TX Southern | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.2 to -0.1 | Limited evidence | -1.3 | +0.1 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.6 | 578 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology