Ty Harper
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2220:39 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 107
- Minutes per game
- 20:45
- Points per game
- 9.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.1 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.6 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 3.7 |
| Season totals | 976 | 222 | 156 | 66 | 9 | 170 | 208 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 316–776 | 40.7% | 7.3 | 14.0 |
| 2P | 215–453 | 47.5% | 4.2 | 8.2 |
| 3P | 101–323 | 31.3% | 3.0 | 5.8 |
| FT | 243–299 | 81.3% | 2.8 | 5.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.2% | 53.8% | 41.6% | 38.5% | 0.92 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Ty Harper | Louisiana | 20 | 19:05 | 5.6 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 11.7 | 35.7%† | 71.0% | 50.6%† |
| 2022 Ty Harper | Louisiana | 12Under 100 minutes | 6:44 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 8.4 | 25.0%† | 66.7%† | 38.1%† |
| 2023 Ty Harper | E Washington | 18 | 6:49 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 11.1 | 43.8%† | 50.0%† | 58.9%† |
| 2025 Ty Harper | Youngstown St | 28 | 28:11 | 10.1 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 14.3 | 28.0% | 79.2% | 52.6% |
| 2026 Ty Harper | Oral Roberts | 29 | 29:11 | 18.3 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 25.1 | 31.7% | 85.0% | 55.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Oral Roberts · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $8K
- 80% range $1K to $45K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.7%
- team pool $205K, 80% range $74K to $550K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $7K to $10K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Oral Roberts: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oral Roberts | $8Kspeculative | $1K to $45K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.1 | -3.6 to -0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -2.7 | +2.7range +2.2 to +3.2 | 2,779 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Youngstown St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.5 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -0.5 | +3.4range +2.9 to +4.2 | 2,842 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | E Washington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.1 to +0.6 | Limited evidence | +0.2 | -0.4 | +0.4range +0.4 to +0.5 | 423 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2021 | Louisiana | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -2.7 | -4.1 to -1.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | -2.0 | Not computed for this season | 1,127 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology