Lee Dort
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
773:03 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 46
- Minutes per game
- 16:48
- Points per game
- 5.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.7 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.6 | 5.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.3 | 13.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Season totals | 257 | 263 | 26 | 13 | 40 | 41 | 114 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 98–161 | 60.9% | 3.5 | 8.3 |
| 2P | 98–161 | 60.9% | 3.5 | 8.3 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 61–97 | 62.9% | 2.1 | 5.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.9% | 63.1% | 0.0% | 60.2% | 0.63 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Lee Dort | Vanderbilt | 14Under 100 minutes | 6:33 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 11.8 | — | 33.3%† | 61.5%† |
| 2025 Lee Dort | California | 6Few games | 12:51 | 3.5 | 5.2 | 0.0 | 10.9 | — | 77.8%† | 65.8%† |
| 2026 Lee Dort | California | 26 | 23:14 | 8.0 | 7.8 | 0.9 | 13.8 | — | 64.6% | 63.0% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
California · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $330K
- 80% range $185K to $520K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.4%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $330K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 46.9%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
California: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | California | $330Kspeculative | $185K to $520K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.0 | +0.8 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +1.9 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.2 | 2,100 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology