Daimion Collins
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1268:29 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 103
- Minutes per game
- 12:19
- Points per game
- 4.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.2 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.8 | 9.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 5.5 |
| Season totals | 437 | 285 | 27 | 27 | 102 | 58 | 173 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 171–301 | 56.8% | 2.9 | 9.5 |
| 2P | 160–249 | 64.3% | 2.4 | 7.9 |
| 3P | 11–52 | 21.2% | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| FT | 84–125 | 67.2% | 1.2 | 3.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.6% | 61.4% | 17.3% | 41.5% | 0.47 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Daimion Collins | Kentucky | 18Under 100 minutes | 4:30 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 15.3 | — | 84.6%† | 65.3%† |
| 2023 Daimion Collins | Kentucky | 22 | 6:51 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 11.4 | 0.0%† | 68.8%† | 51.1%† |
| 2024 Daimion Collins | LSU | 5Few games | 12:15 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 17.0 | 50.0%† | 83.3%† | 69.7%† |
| 2025 Daimion Collins | LSU | 26 | 20:33 | 7.9 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 15.4 | 24.1%† | 66.0% | 62.0% |
| 2026 Daimion Collins | South Fla. | 32 | 13:47 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 11.9 | 16.7%† | 60.0% | 62.0%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
South Florida · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $49K
- 80% range $13K to $130K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.3%
- team pool $1.30M, 80% range $565K to $2.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $38K to $55K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $9K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 31.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
South Florida: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | South Florida | $49Kspeculative | $13K to $130K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.4 | -0.1 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +1.3 | +2.2range +1.9 to +2.6 | 1,361 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | LSU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.9 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +0.5 | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.2 | 1,855 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2023 | Kentucky | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.0 to -0.4 | Limited evidence | -1.1 | -0.1 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 506 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology