Tyson Acuff
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2443:36 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 95
- Minutes per game
- 25:43
- Points per game
- 10.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.6 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.5 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| Season totals | 1006 | 244 | 173 | 70 | 8 | 97 | 121 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 363–843 | 43.1% | 8.9 | 13.8 |
| 2P | 233–472 | 49.4% | 5.0 | 7.7 |
| 3P | 130–371 | 35.0% | 3.9 | 6.1 |
| FT | 150–193 | 77.7% | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.8% | 54.2% | 44.0% | 22.9% | 1.78 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Tyson Acuff | Duquesne | 3Few games | 7:38 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 5.2 | 50.0%† | — | 37.5%† |
| 2022 Tyson Acuff | Duquesne | 22 | 23:54 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 10.2 | 35.8% | 78.6%† | 55.3% |
| 2023 Tyson Acuff | E Michigan | 22 | 34:32 | 14.3 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 16.5 | 33.9% | 80.6% | 57.6% |
| 2024 Tyson Acuff | E Michigan | 18 | 37:19 | 21.4 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 23.0 | 31.5% | 76.9% | 51.7% |
| 2025 Tyson Acuff | Rutgers | 30 | 15:27 | 5.6 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 14.6 | 39.6% | 72.4% | 53.9% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rutgers | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.5 | -1.8 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -1.6 | +1.6range +1.2 to +1.9 | 1,626 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | E Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.1 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -1.5 | +2.3range +1.7 to +2.9 | 2,169 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | E Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.5 | -2.8 to -0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -2.3 | +2.0range +1.4 to +2.6 | 2,743 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Duquesne | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.9 | -3.0 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -1.9 | Not computed for this season | 1,790 | ||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology