Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Dante Harris

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

2993:12 minutes logged

Games logged
110
Minutes per game
27:13
Points per game
8.5
Rebounds / assists per game
3.1 / 3.3
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game8.53.13.31.30.11.81.7
Per 40 minutes12.54.54.92.00.12.72.4
Season totals9333383651468203183
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG351–93137.7%8.512.4
2P288–70241.0%6.49.4
3P63–22927.5%2.13.1
FT168–22774.0%2.13.0
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
41.1%45.3%24.6%24.4%1.80

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
SeasonTeamGMPGPtsRebAstPts/403P%FT%TS%
2021 Dante HarrisGeorgetown 2331:098.53.73.410.927.7%92.1%45.8%
2022 Dante HarrisGeorgetown 2632:0411.73.44.014.627.8%77.0%44.6%
2024 Dante HarrisVirginia 2114:332.62.21.57.210.5%†47.4%†32.2%†
2025 Dante HarrisMemphis 1014:183.11.81.38.750.0%†66.7%†56.1%†
2026 Dante HarrisTennessee St. 3033:0911.63.44.614.030.6%†70.9%47.8%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

Tennessee St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess
$29K
80% range $9K to $81K
Median share of team pool
15.6%
team pool $205K, 80% range $78K to $545K
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
$27K to $30K
the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part
$1K
shared by every player with possessions
Possession share
83.2%
Sufficient evidence
Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.
  • Range driven by assumption, not data

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

Tennessee St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleNetRangeEvidenceRange graphic. Position on one axisOffenseDefenseWins above replacementOn-court possessionsSample and flags
2026Tennessee St$29Kspeculative$9K to $81Kdescriptive: not used in fit or gates+1.3+0.2 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+1.6-0.3+5.9range +5.3 to +6.63,328Season detail
2025MemphisNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc-0.7-1.5 to +0.1Limited evidence-0.2-0.5+0.9range +0.7 to +1.1518Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail
2024VirginiaNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc-0.8-1.8 to +0.1Sufficient evidence-1.3+0.4+1.0range +0.8 to +1.3897Season detail
2022GeorgetownNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection-1.3-2.5 to -0.2Sufficient evidence-0.1-1.3Not computed for this season3,017
2021GeorgetownNone: no budget that season—development: in model selection+0.6-0.4 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+0.1+0.5Not computed for this season2,5622020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology