Ahmir Langlais
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
864:56 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 61
- Minutes per game
- 14:11
- Points per game
- 5.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.9 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.2 | 3.9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.8 | 11.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 6.1 |
| Season totals | 319 | 240 | 20 | 18 | 33 | 60 | 132 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 142–239 | 59.4% | 3.9 | 11.1 |
| 2P | 142–239 | 59.4% | 3.9 | 11.1 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 35–88 | 39.8% | 1.4 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.4% | 57.4% | 0.0% | 36.8% | 0.33 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Ahmir Langlais | W Carolina | 7Few games | 10:37 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 11.8 | — | 50.0%† | 53.6%† |
| 2022 Ahmir Langlais | SC Upstate | 7Few games | 10:31 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 15.8 | — | 42.9%† | 62.8%† |
| 2023 Ahmir Langlais | SC Upstate | 22 | 13:56 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 15.4 | — | 58.1% | 61.1%† |
| 2024 Ahmir Langlais | SC Upstate | 6Few games | 28:29 | 9.8 | 6.7 | 0.5 | 13.8 | — | 22.7%† | 47.8%† |
| 2025 Ahmir Langlais | Tennessee St | 19 | 12:36 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 15.2 | — | 25.0%† | 60.0%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Tennessee St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -1.8 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | -0.1 | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.1 | 864 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | SC Upstate | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -0.7 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | +0.8 | +2.3range +1.9 to +2.6 | 614 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | SC Upstate | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -0.6 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +0.7 | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.8 | 1,007 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology