Hakim Byrd
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1539:13 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 70
- Minutes per game
- 21:59
- Points per game
- 6.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.5 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.6 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| Season totals | 484 | 108 | 126 | 51 | 1 | 98 | 51 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 162–425 | 38.1% | 6.1 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 95–226 | 42.0% | 3.2 | 5.9 |
| 3P | 67–199 | 33.7% | 2.8 | 5.2 |
| FT | 93–109 | 85.3% | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.0% | 51.2% | 46.8% | 25.6% | 1.29 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Hakim Byrd | Marist | 20 | 23:49 | 8.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 14.6 | 32.4% | 83.0% | 54.1% |
| 2022 Hakim Byrd | UMBC | 22 | 7:43 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 10.8 | 22.7%† | 70.0%† | 44.7%† |
| 2025 Hakim Byrd | Utah Tech | 28 | 31:54 | 9.4 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 11.8 | 36.8% | 90.4% | 50.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Utah Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -3.1 | -4.0 to -2.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.1 | -2.1 | +1.7range +1.2 to +2.2 | 3,123 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | UMBC | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.6 | -1.6 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.3 | Not computed for this season | 603 | ||
| 2021 | Marist | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.1 | +0.0 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | +1.1 | Not computed for this season | 1,639 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology