Dean Reiber
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1176:48 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 118
- Minutes per game
- 9:58
- Points per game
- 2.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.5 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.7 | 6.1 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 4.5 |
| Season totals | 286 | 178 | 66 | 29 | 33 | 54 | 133 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 114–277 | 41.2% | 2.3 | 9.4 |
| 2P | 86–155 | 55.5% | 1.3 | 5.3 |
| 3P | 28–122 | 23.0% | 1.0 | 4.1 |
| FT | 30–50 | 60.0% | 0.4 | 1.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.2% | 47.8% | 44.0% | 18.1% | 1.22 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Dean Reiber | Rutgers | 11Under 100 minutes | 5:20 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 3.4 | 0.0%† | 75.0%† | 32.2%† |
| 2022 Dean Reiber | Rutgers | 27 | 7:50 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 15.5 | 58.3%† | 70.0%† | 59.9%† |
| 2023 Dean Reiber | Rutgers | 26 | 6:52 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 10.7 | 20.0%† | 53.3%† | 44.8%† |
| 2024 Dean Reiber | Charlotte | 27 | 14:46 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 9.0 | 23.2% | 69.2%† | 46.0%† |
| 2025 Dean Reiber | Charlotte | 27 | 12:11 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 7.4 | 12.9%† | 37.5%† | 42.6%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
No speculative compensation is published for this player: there is no current-season team to read a pool from.
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Charlotte | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.3 | -2.5 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | -0.6 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.4 | 1,095 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Charlotte | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.1 | -1.0 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | +1.1 | +1.6range +1.2 to +2.0 | 1,266 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Rutgers | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.9 to +1.3 | Limited evidence | -0.4 | +0.6 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8 | 565 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2022 | Rutgers | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +1.0 | -0.1 to +2.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | +0.5 | Not computed for this season | 657 | ||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology