Devan Cambridge

Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.

Observed career performance

3093:03 minutes logged

Games logged: 152
Minutes per game: 20:21
Points per game: 6.8
Rebounds / assists per game: 3.7 / 0.6

Box line on three bases
Basis	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF
Per game	6.8	3.7	0.6	0.6	0.5	0.9	1.8
Per 40 minutes	13.4	7.2	1.3	1.2	1.0	1.8	3.6
Season totals	1035	560	98	89	81	143	280

Shooting with attempts
Shot	Made–att.	Pct	Att/G	Att/40
FG	380–852	44.6%	5.6	11.0
2P	262–444	59.0%	2.9	5.7
3P	118–408	28.9%	2.7	5.3
FT	157–250	62.8%	1.6	3.2

Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%	Estimated TS%	3PA / FGA	FTA / FGA	AST / TO
51.5%	53.8%	47.9%	29.3%	0.69

Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Linked seasons

Linked seasons, per-game and shooting rates. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the declared floor.
Season	Team	G	MPG	Pts	Reb	Ast	Pts/40	3P%	FT%	TS%
2020 Devan Cambridge	Auburn	28	12:51	4.4	2.4	0.1	13.6	35.1%	15.4%†	55.1%
2021 Devan Cambridge	Auburn	23	26:06	9.4	3.7	0.8	14.5	28.0%	61.5%	48.0%
2022 Devan Cambridge	Auburn	29	18:52	5.0	3.4	0.6	10.7	20.0%	66.7%	47.6%
2023 Devan Cambridge	Arizona St	32	26:48	10.0	5.3	0.8	14.9	33.3%	64.5%	58.8%
2024 Devan Cambridge	Texas Tech	3Few games	27:13	11.7	3.7	0.7	17.1	0.0%†	55.6%†	60.4%†
2025 Devan Cambridge	Texas Tech	5Few games	18:06	4.6	3.2	0.4	10.2	66.7%†	50.0%†	64.3%†
2026 Devan Cambridge	UCF	32	17:22	5.4	3.5	0.8	12.4	25.9%	70.5%	56.3%

Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

UCF · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess: $260K; 80% range $95K to $425K
Median share of team pool: 7.6%; team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $5.00M
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4: $260K in all four; the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part: $25K; shared by every player with possessions
Possession share: 43.2%; Sufficient evidence

Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

UCF: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Season	Team	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range	Split role	Net	Range	Evidence	Offense	Defense	Wins above replacement	On-court possessions	Sample and flags
2026	UCF	$260Kspeculative	$95K to $425K	descriptive: not used in fit or gates	+1.3	+0.1 to +2.4	Sufficient evidence	+0.9	+0.4	+3.1range +2.7 to +3.5	1,850	Season detail
2025	Texas Tech	None: no budget that season	—	evaluation: examined, post hoc	+1.5	+0.5 to +2.6	Limited evidence	+0.2	+1.2	+0.3range +0.3 to +0.4	312	Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail
2024	Not applicable	None: no budget that season	—	evaluation: examined, post hoc	No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit.						Not applicable
2023	Arizona St	None: no budget that season	—	evaluation: examined, post hoc	+1.4	+0.1 to +2.5	Sufficient evidence	+0.7	+0.6	+4.2range +3.4 to +5.1	3,053	Season detail
2022	Auburn	None: no budget that season	—	development: in model selection	+0.4	-1.0 to +1.9	Sufficient evidence	+0.3	+0.1	Not computed for this season	1,891
2021	Auburn	None: no budget that season	—	development: in model selection	-0.8	-1.7 to +0.1	Sufficient evidence	+0.4	-1.2	Not computed for this season	2,252	2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag.
2020	Auburn	None: no budget that season	—	development: in model selection	+0.4	-1.1 to +1.7	Sufficient evidence	+0.6	-0.2	Not computed for this season	1,260

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology