Will McClendon
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
915:59 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 57
- Minutes per game
- 16:04
- Points per game
- 3.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.4 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 8.3 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.4 |
| Season totals | 191 | 134 | 51 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 79 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 59–179 | 33.0% | 3.1 | 7.8 |
| 2P | 25–67 | 37.3%† | 1.2 | 2.9 |
| 3P | 34–112 | 30.4% | 2.0 | 4.9 |
| FT | 39–53 | 73.6% | 0.9 | 2.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.5% | 47.2% | 62.6% | 29.6% | 2.22 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Will McClendon | UCLA | 25 | 8:55 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 4.5 | 4.5%† | 60.0%† | 28.8%† |
| 2024 Will McClendon | UCLA | 29 | 21:19 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 8.1 | 35.6% | 70.8%† | 49.8% |
| 2026 Will McClendon | North Texas | 3Few games | 24:57 | 13.7 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 21.9 | 41.2%† | 84.2%† | 61.5%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Texas · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $7K
- 80% range $3K to $17K
- Median share of team pool
- 0.8%
- team pool $900K, 80% range $395K to $2.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $6K to $8K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 5.8%
- Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
- Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Texas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Not applicable | $7Kspeculative, floor only | $3K to $17K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2024 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -1.2 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -0.8 | +2.2range +1.7 to +2.6 | 1,993 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | UCLA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.0 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.1 | -0.1 | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6 | 734 | Season detail | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology