Langston Love
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1785:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 90
- Minutes per game
- 19:50
- Points per game
- 7.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.2 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.6 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 650 | 213 | 84 | 35 | 12 | 69 | 130 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 214–505 | 42.4% | 5.6 | 11.3 |
| 2P | 123–259 | 47.5% | 2.9 | 5.8 |
| 3P | 91–246 | 37.0% | 2.7 | 5.5 |
| FT | 131–167 | 78.4% | 1.9 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.4% | 56.2% | 48.7% | 33.1% | 1.22 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Langston Love | Baylor | 30 | 16:31 | 6.3 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 15.3 | 36.4% | 69.1% | 55.2% |
| 2024 Langston Love | Baylor | 20 | 25:28 | 11.3 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 17.7 | 50.0% | 78.9% | 62.1% |
| 2025 Langston Love | Baylor | 19 | 27:05 | 8.7 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 12.9 | 31.3% | 91.4% | 52.1% |
| 2026 Langston Love | Georgetown | 21 | 12:40 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 10.2 | 25.8%† | 80.0%† | 52.5%† |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgetown · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $62K
- 80% range $17K to $165K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.0%
- team pool $3.65M, 80% range $2.05M to $6.35M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $60K to $62K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 19.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgetown: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgetown | $62Kspeculative | $17K to $165K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.2 | -2.2 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -1.4 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.3 | 779 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Baylor | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -1.8 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -1.7 | +1.5range +1.3 to +1.9 | 1,688 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Baylor | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.9 | +0.6 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +2.2 | -0.3 | +2.3range +1.9 to +2.8 | 1,701 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Baylor | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.6 | +1.3 to +3.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +1.4 | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.9 | 1,710 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology