Nimari Burnett
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
3054:53 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 135
- Minutes per game
- 22:38
- Points per game
- 8.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.2 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.6 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 1112 | 400 | 194 | 98 | 28 | 151 | 278 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 366–840 | 43.6% | 6.2 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 166–310 | 53.5% | 2.3 | 4.1 |
| 3P | 200–530 | 37.7% | 3.9 | 6.9 |
| FT | 180–229 | 78.6% | 1.7 | 3.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.5% | 59.1% | 63.1% | 27.3% | 1.28 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Nimari Burnett | Texas Tech | 9Few games | 18:08 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 13.0 | 23.5%† | 89.3% | 52.7%† |
| 2023 Nimari Burnett | Alabama | 24 | 14:28 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 16.4 | 37.0% | 81.6% | 56.9% |
| 2024 Nimari Burnett | Michigan | 27 | 30:50 | 9.6 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 12.4 | 35.8% | 75.0% | 54.7% |
| 2025 Nimari Burnett | Michigan | 35 | 26:17 | 9.4 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 14.3 | 41.4% | 75.5% | 64.2% |
| 2026 Nimari Burnett | Michigan | 40 | 19:48 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 16.6 | 37.5% | 77.6% | 60.4% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Michigan · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $215K
- 80% range $84K to $355K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.2%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $215K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 50.1%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Michigan: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Michigan | $215Kspeculative | $84K to $355K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.2 | +1.4 to +4.6 | Sufficient evidence | +2.1 | +1.1 | +3.7range +3.1 to +4.2 | 2,795 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.0 | +1.6 to +4.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +1.4 | +5.4range +4.5 to +6.3 | 3,255 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -1.0 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.5 | +2.7range +2.2 to +3.4 | 2,918 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Alabama | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.3 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +0.0 | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.4 | 1,268 | Season detail | |
| 2021 | Texas Tech | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.5 | -0.5 to +1.6 | Limited evidence | -0.5 | +1.0 | Not computed for this season | 487 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology