Jacob Crews
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2155:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 107
- Minutes per game
- 20:08
- Points per game
- 9.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.9 / 0.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.3 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.4 | 7.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 991 | 421 | 51 | 40 | 21 | 73 | 141 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 329–760 | 43.3% | 7.1 | 14.1 |
| 2P | 148–294 | 50.3% | 2.7 | 5.5 |
| 3P | 181–466 | 38.8% | 4.4 | 8.6 |
| FT | 152–192 | 79.2% | 1.8 | 3.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.2% | 58.7% | 61.3% | 25.3% | 0.70 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Jacob Crews | North Florida | 14 | 13:42 | 5.1 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 15.0 | 31.7% | 83.3%† | 45.2%† |
| 2022 Jacob Crews | North Florida | 6Few games | 9:24 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 5.0 | 15.4%† | 50.0%† | 18.5%† |
| 2024 Jacob Crews | TN Martin | 26 | 34:14 | 18.9 | 8.2 | 1.1 | 22.1 | 42.4% | 79.5% | 62.6% |
| 2025 Jacob Crews | Missouri | 28 | 12:00 | 5.1 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 17.2 | 33.7% | 69.2%† | 50.8% |
| 2026 Jacob Crews | Missouri | 33 | 20:39 | 8.4 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 16.2 | 43.4% | 81.4% | 65.4% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Missouri · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $355K
- 80% range $190K to $565K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.1%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $355K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 51.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Missouri: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Missouri | $355Kspeculative | $190K to $565K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.9 | +0.8 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +2.9 | -1.0 | +3.6range +3.2 to +4.1 | 2,260 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Missouri | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.2 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +2.1 | -2.2 | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.4 | 1,083 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | TN Martin | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | -0.6 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | -0.6 | +3.6range +2.7 to +4.3 | 3,162 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2021 | North Florida | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.3 | -0.9 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.8 | Not computed for this season | 647 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. | |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology