Markhi Strickland
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1715:34 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 78
- Minutes per game
- 22:00
- Points per game
- 8.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.7 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.9 | 5.4 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 681 | 233 | 82 | 66 | 16 | 96 | 162 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 295–566 | 52.1% | 7.3 | 13.2 |
| 2P | 291–539 | 54.0% | 6.9 | 12.6 |
| 3P | 4–27 | 14.8%† | 0.3 | 0.6 |
| FT | 87–184 | 47.3% | 2.4 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.5% | 52.6% | 4.8% | 32.5% | 0.85 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Markhi Strickland | St Louis | 5Few games | 7:24 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 9.7 | — | 50.0%† | 35.6%† |
| 2022 Markhi Strickland | St Louis | 10Under 100 minutes | 4:18 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 18.6 | — | 66.7%† | 46.2%† |
| 2024 Markhi Strickland | W Michigan | 5Few games | 12:20 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 11.0 | 0.0%† | 62.5%† | 62.9%† |
| 2025 Markhi Strickland | W Michigan | 26 | 29:55 | 11.0 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 14.7 | 16.7%† | 44.3% | 49.0% |
| 2026 Markhi Strickland | North Dakota St. | 32 | 24:53 | 10.9 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 17.6 | 0.0%† | 47.1% | 56.7% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
N Dakota St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $24K
- 80% range $7K to $70K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.4%
- team pool $265K, 80% range $100K to $705K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $19K to $26K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 62.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
N Dakota St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | N Dakota St | $24Kspeculative | $7K to $70K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.3 | +0.1 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +0.6 | +4.5range +3.9 to +5.2 | 2,410 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | W Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.7 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +0.2 | +2.9range +2.4 to +3.6 | 2,650 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2022 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology