Adam Miller
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
3777:14 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 139
- Minutes per game
- 27:10
- Points per game
- 9.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.3 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.7 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 1298 | 330 | 188 | 107 | 7 | 179 | 247 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 441–1127 | 39.1% | 8.1 | 11.9 |
| 2P | 217–439 | 49.4% | 3.2 | 4.6 |
| 3P | 224–688 | 32.6% | 4.9 | 7.3 |
| FT | 192–246 | 78.0% | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.1% | 52.5% | 61.0% | 21.8% | 1.05 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Adam Miller | Illinois | 29 | 25:40 | 8.5 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 13.2 | 33.1% | 69.4% | 51.7% |
| 2023 Adam Miller | LSU | 24 | 33:14 | 10.6 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 12.8 | 28.0% | 84.7% | 46.0% |
| 2024 Adam Miller | Arizona St | 22 | 31:23 | 11.6 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 14.8 | 29.6% | 80.0% | 52.1% |
| 2025 Adam Miller | Arizona St | 29 | 29:36 | 9.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 13.4 | 43.0% | 75.6% | 60.3% |
| 2026 Adam Miller | Gonzaga | 35 | 19:37 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 14.8 | 30.2% | 75.0% | 53.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Gonzaga · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $245K
- 80% range $110K to $480K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.4%
- team pool $3.15M, 80% range $1.75M to $5.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $240K to $255K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $21K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 49.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Gonzaga: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Gonzaga | $245Kspeculative | $110K to $480K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.4 | +1.9 to +4.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | +2.8 | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.1 | 2,318 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Arizona St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.3 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +1.3 | +3.3range +2.8 to +4.0 | 2,829 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Arizona St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -2.0 to -0.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -1.0 | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.4 | 2,463 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | LSU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.2 | -3.0 to -1.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | -1.5 | +2.2range +1.6 to +2.8 | 2,691 | Season detail | |
| 2021 | Illinois | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +2.0 | +0.5 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +1.9 | Not computed for this season | 2,632 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology